01
Scope is assumed instead of agreed.
The proposal, email thread and client expectations describe the work differently. Deliverables, exclusions and client inputs remain open to interpretation.
Make scope, evidence, acceptance, payment and change clear before the work starts.
Commercial contract attorneys for reviews, agreement builds and recurring contract work, handled by the same attorney.
Vague scope, unclear acceptance, payment that depends on opinion rather than proof, and change requests drifting through email do not feel dramatic at kickoff. They become expensive when delivery and payment no longer agree.
01
The proposal, email thread and client expectations describe the work differently. Deliverables, exclusions and client inputs remain open to interpretation.
02
Completion has no agreed evidence, review window or valid reason for rejection. The work may be finished while approval and payment remain discretionary.
03
Another round, feature or workshop enters the project through email. The work changes immediately; the fee, deadline and written scope do not.
A contract should not just describe the deal. It should run the work.
Review it before you sign. Build it properly before kickoff. When contracts keep arriving, use a Contracts Desk for ongoing attorney support. If the process itself needs work, redesign the contract flow.
Before signature
Review your agreement before you sign, showing where scope, acceptance, payment or change are exposed and what should be fixed in the negotiation.
Before kickoff
Turn your proposal, SOW, service model or client paper into a service agreement or SOW package built around how the work will happen.
When contracts keep arriving
Ongoing review, drafting, redlines and negotiation support for businesses with recurring customer or supplier contracts.
Operative.law is a new public brand. Its attorneys are not new to the work. Every matter is handled by an admitted attorney. Nothing is routed to an anonymous drafting queue.
Admitted attorney (South Africa), LLM · Cross-Border Transactions · Legal Tech Implementation · Building Agreemint.dev
Rechtsassessor (Ass. iur.) · Fully qualified in German law; not admitted to a Rechtsanwaltskammer · Legal engineering and digital workflows · German client work.
Admitted attorney (South Africa) · Former Investec Legal · Banking, finance & lending transactions · Property transactions.
Short answers about fees, agreement builds, ongoing support, contract workflows and implementation boundaries.
Operative.law offers Contract Review from R7,500 fixed fee. The engagement includes a plain-English commercial summary, a risk map covering scope, evidence, acceptance, payment and change, specific legal flags where relevant, and recommended fixes and fallback positions. The published amount is a starting price, not a quote for a specific matter.
Yes. Agreement Build starts from R18,500 and begins with a structured intake and scoping call. It turns a proposal, statement of work, service model or client paper into one service agreement or SOW package. The work sets out deliverables, evidence, acceptance, payment and change terms, with an attorney-reviewed plain-English deal summary.
Contracts Desk is the recurring option: from R25,000 per month for a defined monthly queue of reviews, drafting, redlines and negotiation support, with agreed turnaround bands, reusable clauses, fallback positions and SOW packs. Disputes and litigation are excluded. If the problem is the contracting process itself, Contract Flow Design is the more relevant engagement.
Contract Flow Design is a scoped engagement for recurring contract work. Operative.law maps intake, ownership, approvals, templates, legal-review points, records and handover into delivery, then designs a clearer operating flow around them. It is useful when agreements depend on inboxes, individual memory, unclear ownership or improvised approvals. It is attorney-designed workflow work, not a software product.
Yes. Operative.law can assess an existing workflow, identify control gaps and define what information, responsibility, approval, legal review, template, record and handover each stage requires. The engagement can include workflow design, technology evaluation and agreed implementation work. Software development, system configuration and production integration are included only when expressly scoped.
Tell us what the contract needs and when the deal must move. Written scope, fee and timing follow a conflict check.
Prefer email? paul@operative.law